Mr.Kia Golesorkhi, MPhil.,MSc.,BA., BSc.
 

Kia Golesorkhi is an instructor, researcher, management consultant and trainer. He is affiliated to the Faculty of Business and Economics of the University of Pécs.

He is an advocate of decentralization and knowledge based development. He has taught Economic Policy, Sustainable Development, Healthcare Management, Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management. He has designed and delivered EMBA type courses for healthcare executives as well as engineer executives.  He has worked with 33 countries and 5 industries in the field of international business management. His current industries of interest are Healthcare and the so-called „contracting” segment of the construction and civil engineering industries. His most recent affiliation is migration health. He has spent his life in 4 countries and began his first 5 years of school 3 decades ago in one the most international school chains with 72 nationalities.
 

 

Title -“Post crisis economic policy: From A-Con-Mix Policy’ to A-Con-No-Mix Policy"

Discussion: The financial crisis vs. public - private transparency and accountability
 

Abstract
 

The ‘financial crisis’ has helped shine further light on the consequences of low stakeholder “transparency” and “accountability” in the system of the global economy. The changing perceptions of governments’ roles and the position of political institutions after the cold war have supported proactive attempts for redefining the contents (variables) and function of economic policy making in the 21st century. However, these attempts have not lead to the wide-spread institutionalization of the so-called ‘new post-welfare or sustainable economics”, especially at the global scale. Stakeholder involvement, symmetry of information, stakeholder training, and development, along with the detrimental role of financial institutes and the media have attracted increasing attention for public policy analysis. Incidences such as the Lehmann brothers provide a study worthy case. The discussion brought here in has the following aims: 1)- Provide a brief introduction of what is meant by public-private transparency. Questions: “Is government transparency only a myth?”, “Are we also responsible for the governments’ and MNCs’ lack of accountability?” 2)- Through evidence suggest that the crisis could have been prevented if the governments had been accountable and transparent, and had  played their actual role as coordinators and auditors, Questions: “Is a win-win situation achievable at a global scale?” 3)- Suggest a framework for the future  stakeholder roles and modes of conduct .